Eurovision is slicker than ever. But is that a good thing?

I admit it. I began watching Eurovision and laughing at it rather than with it. That was probably around ten years ago now.

It was gauche, camp and gaudy and kept me smiling from the first key change to the 20th. And that was often in the same song, back then!

I often envisaged a back-stage pre performance run through as going something like this:

  • Wind machine set to maximum (gale force) – check
  • White blazer or similar – check
  • White hugging tee – check
  • Skin-tight white pants/ hint of camel-toe – check
  • Key change#1 ready – check
  • Key change #2 ready – check
  • Boundless enthusiasm & Passion to burn- check, check, check!!!

And out they leapt on to stage.

For me and those at my Eurovision parties in those days it was about the performance, the passion and the Chutzpah! Not really about the music so much.

In fact when a good song came along it was almost a pleasant surprise and, in any event, by the time it arrived Terry Wogan, myself and my party guests were all too drunk to notice.

Loreen changed everything

Then in 2012 Eurovision changed. And it changed forever. At least in my opinion.

The agent of change was named Loreen and she hailed from Sweden.

The song was bombastic and anthemic. It soared like an eagle to crescendos hitherto unseen in this contest. And it was a commercial and club uber hit around the globe. And it sounded contemporary. Almost cutting edge and that was the thing.

As much as I loved Eurovision one could never have said it was modern. Certainly not in any way – a la mode. It was more than a little bit out-dated and in fact to the mainstream it was quite unfashionable. And I think for many fans like me this retro-facet held much of it’s appeal.

It was kind of like someone wearing a peach-coloured Miami Vice suit in the Naughties and believing they were cool.

But Loreen changed all this. Eurovision ever since has been a different affair.

Eurovision turns Professional.

Since 2012 I have noticed profound change. Kind of like a sport transitioning from amateur to professional or a football club being promoted to the Premier League.

Eurovision is now slicker than a Mafia Don’s hair do.

  • Slick – A mere 90 seconds between performers to change-over the entire stage set.
  • Slick – On stage choreography & lighting. Ye gads there’s even live CGI on stage.
  • Slick – The amazing Webby-Award-Winning Eurovision website and fully integrated social media platforms.
  • Slick – Stylish, well spoken and composed hosts…

Oh how I long for a return of the old days. When Somewhereastan’s  hosts, Borat & Betina, almost spat out their teeth whilst wrestling with the English scripts scrolling cruelling down their teleprompters before them. And then there were the indeterminably long pauses where no-one, certainly not Borat nor Betina, had any clue what was:

  1. happening, nor…
  2. what was supposed to be happening.


Commentators curse?

Part of the joy of my Eurovision experience over the journey has also been the TV commentary. The doyen amongst these commentators of course being the British voice of Eurovision – Terry Wogan. Sadly now lost to us all he possessed a wit drier than the Sahara in drought.

The changing face of the ‘ESC’ has also effected this aspect of the spectacle.

True, the commentary  of the Graham Nortons or Sam Pangs et al has never actually been so rude as to poke their tongues directly out at the performers. That said those tongues have always been pressed firmly into the side of commentary cheeks throughout the call. And that has always been part of the fun.

But it seems this ‘taking-the-mickey’ approach is getting harder and works less well these days.

“Is Eurovision becoming Cool?”

Quipped a bemused Sam Pang (Australian SBS co-commentator) after uber cool Justin Timberlake grooved & styled the roof off the Globe Auditorium in Stockholm. It was indeed a fair point.

It might be time to head down to the Drôle-Office perhaps gents?

2016. Year of the ‘Meh’?

Because of this new-found focus on the music and less on choreography and cleavage a new hazard has emerged. What if the songs are no good or below-par?

Each year individual countries vote and submit their own song independent of others. There is no centralisation. The last few years, in my opinion,  have produced many, many great songs but luck may have deserted us this year.^

In fairness I’ve been fairly busy and haven’t finished my ‘research’ yet but what I have heard so far hasn’t set the excitement-meter aflutter. From a trawl through some of the forums too the consensus seems to be that there has been better years.

But not to worry. Eurovision 2016 will still be…

Big, brash and bold!

And it will likely be a slick, high quality production too.

Most of all though it will be – FUN – and I can’t wait.


I actually ended up really liking quite a few of this year’s songs after watching the live performances. See the power of Eurovision! As I edit this post I am actually listening to a few of the tracks. My favs ended up being:

Sweden, France, Belgium, Germany & Bulgaria.

Lest we forgot the past. The very white and very, VERY enthusiastic past.



Travel is my passion and also my career. I’ve spent my entire working-life in the travel industry with roles as diverse as tour guide, travel agent and marketing manager for some of the worlds largest travel brands. My favourite city in the world to visit is NYC and France is my most beloved country to explore. I travel to learn and observe to understand always with camera in hand.

9 thoughts on “Eurovision is slicker than ever. But is that a good thing?

  1. Hello Saxon,

    Thanks for commenting on my Eurovision predictions and linking to your own article. I mist say I found it an interesting read; I thoroughly enjoy this type of analysis. To this day, I despise the Loreen song, but I think you’re right that it was sort of a game changer. It can’t be a coincidence that my own country (I’m Dutch) started taking things more seriously by sending bigger stars and less outdated material from 2013.

    What may be a factor in things – which is something you’re implying but not explicitely stating – is that quite a lot of songs in the ESC are written and produced by Swedish production teams. Thomas G:son is of particular interest to me, because he plays guitar in Hardrock band Masquerade and he co-wrote a few entries I really, really liked in the past few years (Nina Sublatti’s ‘Warrior’, Edurne’s ‘Amanacer’). The downside to this is that the Contest as a whole is starting to sound too homogenous, as you’re rightfully stating in your post. Of course I can appreciate a great performance, but it all starts with a good song for me.

    Also, I see the necessity for the three minute limit on the songs to keep the broadcast concise, but in all honesty, I would be happy if they’re going to be a bit more lenient with that. Sometimes a song just needs a little more room. For instance: I’m sure that Maria Elena Kyriakou’s ‘One Last Breath’, Greece’s entry for last year, was supposed to be a longer song with a grand, epic build-up.

    For me personally, two things need to change. First of all, something needs to shake up the system like Lordi’s ‘Hard Rock Hallelujah’ – the first and so far only entry I ever voted for – did ten years ago. Secondly, Turkey needs to compete again. There isn’t a country of which I loved the entries as consistently as I did with Turkey.

    Once again: thanks for stopping by! I will post my final verdict on my blog sometime after the Contest.



    Liked by 1 person

    1. Oh Yes. Good point about Turkey. I didn’t even notice that they had stopped. I don’t normally watch the ‘semis’. I think I am going to update my post because I ended up quite liking a few of the songs this year. I think I was a bit harsh calling it the year of ‘Meh. Although for me the true stars of Eurovision were the hosts. And in particular Petra!! Look forward to your update. Cheers


      1. Turkey has some sort of conflict with the EBU, as far as I’ve understood. They make it come across as a principle thing, but my guess is that it’s a money thing. Turkey used to always send some of their biggest Pop and Rock stars and the results were stunning to me. Then again, I may be a bit biased as a fan of Turkish music.

        Personally, I don’t think you were that harsh, but I do agree with you that Petra did an amazing job. I even mentioned it in my review. I love the fact that Eurovision seemed to take itself slightly less seriously this year. Kudos to that.

        I think I’m going to post a report with examples of what I think this Eurovision Song Contest lacked tomorrow. Please do keep an eye out if that sort of thing interests you.

        Liked by 2 people

Share your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.